"History of the Inca Empire" (1653).

The main two groups of people that comprised the Aztecs were the Mexica and the Nahuatl-speakers.

Revere and greet your elders; console the poor and the afflicted with good works and words. . . . Follow not the madmen who honor neither father nor mother; for they are like animals, for they neither take nor hear advice. . . . Do not mock the old, the sick, the maimed, or one who has sinned. Do not insult or abhor them, but abase yourself before God and fear lest the same befall you. . . . Do not set a bad example, or speak indiscreetly, or interrupt the speech of another. If someone does not speak well or coherently, see that you do not the same; if it is not your business to speak, be silent. If you are asked something, reply soberly and without affectation or flattery or prejudice to others, and your speech will be well regarded. . . . Wherever you go, walk with a peaceful air, and do not make wry faces or improper gestures. (Zorita)

The same emphasis on moderation, responsibility, and selfrestraint is found in the Precepts of the Elders, a class of literature written in a high-flown and wordy style to instruct young people in behavior and manners. Here is one Aztec father talking to his son:

A well-bred Aztec was, however, expected to exercise selfcontrol and to behave with dignity. Sahagun has left a word-portrait of the perfect nobleman, a person who is serious and modest, who 'wishes no praise', who is 'solicitous of others', chaste and devout, eloquent but discreet in his conversation, diligent, wise, polite, 'a follower in the ways of his parents', and an example to other people. This, of course, is an idealized picture, and the high standard of behavior may have been more often sought after than achieved.

The Incan link of government and religion is a large part of their political structure....

The likely answer is the “vile hypocrisy” of the Europeans. Remembering that the Spanish monarchy considered itself to be model and devote Christians. It wouldn’t “do” for them to murder and enslave ordinary Humans, so a way would have to be found to de-humanize them. To make them so ferocious and depraved as to justify the atrocities that were to be done to them, (they had already done the same thing to the Caribe Indians with their allegations of cannibalization). It is therefore quite plausible that the Spanish forced or coerced the Aztec into making bogus artifacts depicting atrocities to others, as a way of justifying what was to happen to them.

Ancient Greek agriculture was the very necessity of the empire.

All of the Aztec codices and stele depicting Human sacrifice that we see today - were made after the Aztec had been conquered!!! Even at the Cenotes of sacrifice at Chichen itza, where there are so many stories of people being thrown in as sacrifices to the gods. Modern day dredging has recovered many items of gold and jade as well as pottery – “But” no Human remains. The explanation for this is that the Spanish destroyed all of the original Aztec Books and stele. Which seems pretty strange, when you consider that the Spanish were very keen to study the Aztec. Why then too, allow such a great abundance of it to be re-created after the fact. If it wasn’t right for them to exist before, why was it right afterward?

Inca Empires in Mesoamerica and the Andean Regions

Although an empire might seem prosperous, the decline and fall of empires are sometimes inevitable.

Their systems of religion and technological innovation helped not only to leave a permanent impression on the world, but also served to mold both the civilizations that directly followed it as well as society today....

The Incas, Aztecs, and Mayas were just three of these civilizations.

He also asked whether incorporation was a single event or a series of events for the different regions of the Empire--Rumelia, Anatolia, Syria, and Egypt.


The fall of the aztec and inca empires essays

It was clearly visible that the Roman Emperor was the backbone of Roman stability and therefore the strength of the Roman army was also crucial in ensuing the empire's stability....

the rise and fall of empires project 20 november 2013

Clearly, as is typical with Whites and their "made-up" histories, the above is not history, it is a canned recording of a few Whites, defeating thousands of non-Whites, brought out as the historical situation requires. In both cases, other sources indicate that the native allies of the Spanish numbered in the many tens-of-thousands, and it was THEY who conquered the Aztec and the Inca. In South America, some of these tribes were foolish enough to actually SUE the Spanish in SPANISH courts, for the rights and benefits that they were promised, but never received.

Ten artifiacts that portray the rise, apex, and fall of the Aztec empire ..

Its achievements were monumental for the era, being the first empire communicating with the use of a written language having over 800 symbols and producing the first 365 day calendar....

Get access to Aztecs Vs Inca Civilization Essays only from Anti Essays. Listed Results 1 - 30. Get studying today and get the grades you want. Only at

Outnumbered and fearing an imminent attack from the Inca general Rumiñahui, after several months the Spanish saw Atahualpa as too much of a liability and decided to execute him. Pizarro staged a mock trial and found Atahualpa guilty of revolting against the Spanish, practicing idolatry and murdering Huáscar, his brother. Atahualpa was sentenced to execution by burning. He was horrified, since the Inca believed that the soul would not be able to go on to the afterlife if the body were burned. Friar Vicente de Valverde, who had earlier offered his breviary to Atahualpa, intervened, telling Atahualpa that if he agreed to convert to Catholicism, he would convince Pizarro to commute the sentence. Atahualpa agreed to be baptized into the Catholic faith. He was given the name Juan Santos Atahualpa. In accordance with his request, he was strangled with a garrote instead of being burned on July 26, 1533. Following his execution, his clothes and some of his skin were burned, and his remains were given a Christian burial.